|
gilbertobesanko (August 21, 2008 at 10:06 am)
you have to not take it out of context what the church fathers are saying their is a subordination withing the trinity father the head son then the Holy spirit itslike a mariage
mikko522 (June 25, 2008 at 3:16 pm)
So many people get hung up on this. I cosider the Holy Trinity as a set like in mathematics. The set (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) meaning Gods fingerprints and evidence of divine work on Earth. Its a short hand way of recognizing the ongoing work of the Father, His Son Jesus and the Holy Spirit sent on the day of Pentacost. That is it!
mitchkramah (March 4, 2008 at 5:02 pm)
(...cont) Of Christ? One WHO DENIES THAT CHRIST IS GOD CANNOT BECOME HIS TEMPLE. Of the Holy Spirit? Since the THREE ARE ONE, how were it possible for the Holy Spirit to be reconciled to him that is an enemy of either the Son or of the Father?" [Faith of the Early Fathers, Vol 1. pg238]Right there a Pope, BEFORE CONSTANTINE, not only recognises the TRINITY, but takes it a step farther and states that if someone DENIES IT, they are NOT of Christs Temple. Does the WT fit that description?
mitchkramah (March 4, 2008 at 4:35 pm)
A letter from Pope Cyprian Bishop Jubaianus in Mauretania (between 254/256 A.D.) "If someone could be baptised by heretics, he could certainly recieve also the remission of sins. f he were to recieve the remission of sins, he would be sanctified. If he were sanctified, he would be made a temple of God. If he were made a temple of God -now I ask you of what God? Of the Creator? But that is not possible, because he does not believe in Him. (cont...)
bobjbush (February 23, 2008 at 11:34 pm)
I challedge you to go to six screens of the watch tower. Look at the old books published by the watch tower and see the false prophecies for yourself and the distortions of the truth.
phoenixortiz5 (February 23, 2008 at 4:08 am)
A video on what others taught in the past. Just read the Bible. It will teach you...one reference is Romans 8:9-11
glee360 (January 13, 2008 at 10:57 am)
the courts are unbiased, but you are in favor of Franz. You can stick up for him all you like, the fact remains, he was given a choice in a court of law and he refused. This is fact. Go ahead and explain it away, like the Watchtower does it's false prophecies.
glee360 (January 13, 2008 at 9:55 am)
He said he would not do that...this is fact. Ok why would he not? Oh because he just did not feel like it, or maybe he forgot his spectacles to read with, yeah thats why. Take care. Good day or good night. I must go to one of those places tomorrow that worship the cross, or could it be worship One who was nailed on it?
glopez2917 (January 13, 2008 at 9:52 am)
The courts are unbiased on what it says, I think where you got your resource from they're are cutting out a part they might be the biased ones. So tell me exactly what sections does Franz say he doesn't know Hebrew?
glopez2917 (January 13, 2008 at 9:47 am)
Its not a fact what you are talking about. Where is the proof where he said he didn't know Hebrew? The court records don't show that. Show me what paragraph? |
