|
TalesOfWar (April 27, 2008 at 1:21 pm)
If they came out with these a little sooner then I'm sure they would have. Apple went over to Intel because the PPC chips couldn't give them the power they needed for their next line of systems, they were fairly stagnent whilst Intel were going ahead leaps and bounds. They didn't want there to be a massive gap in hardware power between Mac's and "PC's", so decided to use the traditional "PC" cpu's instead. It was a good move too, higher compatibility levels was a result.
devonrose742 (February 27, 2008 at 7:14 am)
IBM is still making innovations in personal computing... But I do not like apple's methods, apple hardware isn't as good as IBM, nor will I ever use it. IBM is simply the best and will always be the best.
pirokiko7 (August 24, 2007 at 11:22 am)
The power6 IS a different processor, cell chips are made to be an all in one package, and power6s work in parallel
vasilepanasonic (June 14, 2007 at 5:35 pm)
You may want to check out the software lineup from IBM. They are really far from gaving up on software ;).
Nopp3 (June 7, 2007 at 4:07 am)
ibm was smart,and gave up on software and personal computers when gates rolled along to jump over to hardware, apple needs to find something to call their own, unless thats Pc accessories ofc ><..
neyway (May 23, 2007 at 3:25 am)
they shoulda installed that on apple |
