Search:

F1 Racing Formula One Racing F1 Car Racing Grand Prix Racing F1 Kart Racing McLaren Racing Team Williams F1 Team Ferrari F1 Racing Renault F1 Team F1 Racing Cars Racing School F1 Racing Game BMW F1 Racing Indy Car Racing

Mansell vs. Piquet - Silverstone 1987

Formula 1 Racing
Formula 1 Racing Formula 1 Racing
Formula 1 Racing

By lap 45 the gap, between Mansell and Piquet was just over 20 seconds with Mansell lapping around 2 seconds a lap faster than Nelson. The Brazilian's tyres were shot and Nigel was moving with greater urgency. He may have been a long way down behind a driver with two world championships under his belt but that was not going to stop Nigel. By lap 53 the gap was 9.6 seconds, on lap 60 it was down to 1.6 seconds and then came lap 60 and the move of the decade.Just 0.5 seconds split the pair as they approached Stowe. Mansell feinted left and Piquet sought to block the move. He had been sold a dummy and Nigel was already pointing to the inside. He darted through and beat Piquet by almost two seconds, sent the crowds delirious.

Channel: Sports
Uploaded: June 28, 2006 at 1:20 pm
Author: 5150UK

Length: 01:32
Rating: 4.67
Views: 153627

Tags: 1987  British  Era  F1  Grand  Honda  Hunt  James  Mansell  Murray  Nelson  Nigel  Piquet  Prix  Silverstone  Turbo  Walker  Williams  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

JeovaNeto (October 15, 2008 at 6:49 am)
Rommeljnr, I'm sorry, but your comment has many mistakes.1-Mansell was not leading the championship when he had that injury in Suzuka. 2-Piquet had a 12 points lead that day, which means that, by not running in Suzuka, Mansell lost any chance of winning the title and it's irrelevant the fact that he also couldn't run the next GP.3-Piquet didn't run in San Marino because of his crash, which means that only 2 GPs left he had a 12 points lead having missed one GP.
SegaMegadriveMic (October 3, 2008 at 12:45 am)
Go, Mansell!
marcoscharles (September 29, 2008 at 5:54 pm)
Nigel who ????
Gauchoo1234 (August 29, 2008 at 5:23 pm)
well... the same way Prost got lucky in 1986, Lauda got lucky in 1984, Rosberg got lucky in 1982 and so on... Altough I don't like to rely on luckiness to crown someone a champion (yo man, all these pilots got all the credit for being champs, they won races and scored enough points to!), one can always use this excuse to 'credit' his rival the title :-)
timmyt258 (August 28, 2008 at 8:40 pm)
there were 2 aussie champions
timmyt258 (August 28, 2008 at 8:33 pm)
mansell won 31 grands prix to dc's 13, u know...
timmyt258 (August 28, 2008 at 7:06 pm)
piquet was a great driver but u know, there was a bit of luck in all 3 of his titles - carlos reutemann blew a 17 point lead in 1981, prost threw away a 14 point advantage in 1983, and mansell scored just 7 points beside his 6 wins in 1987
newniounew (August 17, 2008 at 4:58 am)
very good
Rommeljnr (August 17, 2008 at 12:24 am)
I understand your loyalty to your fellow country man , but the simple fact is Senna was a better driver than Piquet and i watched a interview with Senna before he died were he said Mansell was the toughest competitor that he ever raced against and the only other driver he had respect for.
Gauchoo1234 (August 15, 2008 at 10:35 pm)
I'm sorry for him, but you can't argue this way. There's NO bad luck in there. Otherwise, Piquet could have won in 1984 (when he had the fastest car by far, but unbeliaveble unreliable - poor luck?), in 1980 (just take one or other retirement and that's it), in 1990/1991 (if only Ford had delivered the long awaited V10 engine wich would lead the Bennettons to the title. All bad luck?Definetly not. All of these is part of racing. Mansell was a GREAT driver but just don't compare him to Piquet

Formula 1 Racing © 2007 All Rights Reserved.