|
timetraveler3797 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
At least it won't be increased, biodeisel is carbon nuetral, that's kinda the point.
timetraveler3797 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Please tell me the article where you found that. I am trying to find a way to produce it myself to prove it just isn't that hard.
tetranoob (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Apparently you can use sound to open up the algae and extract the lipids. Ultrasound probably
ryanparente (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
bio diesel is a 0 emissions process.algae removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and then releases it back it doesn't add any more than was already there.
puka3300 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
at least its not increasing as with do with diesel
timetraveler3797 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
There's new ideas on just to keep a closed system that just spins off oil with little cleaning or conatmintaion. I read about that 3 days ago.
siliconaconcarne (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Bio-diesel is THE GREAT LIE. If you can produce all the fuel that you want, people WILL NEVER REDUCE THEIR CO2 EMISSION. Bio diesel is the same as petrol but never ending, so that the CO2 emission will never be reduced. I'm engineering, too.
plumber3dad (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
No Kidding! All that equipment could be bought at a home center. Except those pool float mat thingys. And the water is non potable like AC condensation or potty water.
timetraveler3797 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I think that's called a greenhouse, it's not that damn expensive. Greenhouses are used commercialy, so it should be an ivestment, not a detriment.
tcurtin07 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
it also costs a lot of money to research and produce. You need specific strands of algae, which is the trouble they originally had years ago with the NREL years ago. Foreign strands kept invading the ponds. It works best to produce the algae in an enclosed area, which costs significantly more than a pond. |
