|
whitedane (October 12, 2008 at 5:33 pm)
....Photos and experiences can only lead to theories ......So a photo of a lion is only a theory until you see it? But that would be an experience and still a theory....so is there ever fact? Is it a theory that you think and are alive? Your writing a comment is only a theory to me by your definition lol:)
whitedane (October 12, 2008 at 5:31 pm)
So you think a child that survives an aborion, that can obviously surive on it's own without being a "parisite" has no rights and is not a person? Wow, cruel.Have you ever talked to abortion survivers? Oh, guess you cant talk to non persons,lol. So when does a child become a person? with rights? As an adult? When is it ok not to kill a child? Mom tries to get an abortion, fails so she thinks for a few days, decides nope, dont want a kid and tries agin....thats ok? This isnt logic, its twisted.
writersblock111 (October 12, 2008 at 5:27 pm)
Experiences arnt theorys, or is the fact you "think" your dog can hear you when you call his name only a theory? Mabey its a theory that dogs are deaf when they dont respond? Guess if you cant read a dogs mind, the fact that they can learn to sit is only a theory.
writersblock111 (October 12, 2008 at 5:25 pm)
Have you ever been pregnant? My wife and I would play with our son in the womb. We would tickle one side and he would roll and kick, then we would tickle somewhere else and he would respond. When surgens do surgery on a fetus or hav to give a needle, the child will aviod it, try to turn, move away bc it knows what is coming. A fetus responds to sounds and responds differently to different ppl. Some calm with classical, or with stories, or other music.
writersblock111 (October 12, 2008 at 5:19 pm)
Wether they "define" a fetus as a child, it is a child. Ppl used to say slaves wernt human, did that change what they were? No. Child, fetus, parasite, they are names, they don't change what they are refering to.So you agree with woman(I wont say mother, mothers have kids, they don't kill them)who kill their babies that survive abortions. There is a difference between a religion denying blood transfussions and a woman who tries to kill her child but failed the first time,so she tries again.
DespondentDream (October 12, 2008 at 3:33 pm)
If the fetus survives then the mother has the choice to retry or keep the child. I know several women that, after it's survival, WOULD NOT try to abort again. If a mother can deny medical support to a baby because her religion tells her medicine is evil, then a mother can deny medical support for any reason. What's the difference between basing a choice in religion or personal desire? If religion is enough reason to let humans suffer, then controling your own destiny is enough to let a fetus go.
DespondentDream (October 12, 2008 at 3:25 pm)
No, BY DEFINITION, a fetus IS a parasite. "an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment." Don't go by the first reaction to the word. And SOME people don't define a fetus as a child, thus, to those people, abortion IS NOT killing a child.
Starlanza (October 12, 2008 at 9:11 am)
Actually there is no hard evidence that a foetus can even truly think. Unless you can actually read the mind of a foetus than you can never really know. Photos and experiences can only lead to theories (granted they are valid).
itssjessicababe (October 12, 2008 at 7:07 am)
this is amazing. God bless
catholichomeschool (October 11, 2008 at 7:27 pm)
cindeemorgan, you are very welcome and may God Bless you also! |
