|
satininacoffin10 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
oh yeah, cause Lyndon Johnson was such a fucking peacemaker...he was the one who committed the country to the Vietnam War. He seemed just fine with causing a senseless massacre.
reanimated93 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
lmao
Poliscinut51083 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
No the implication was that Goldwater was unreliable in terms of national security when compared against LBJ
kain1384 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
It's like terrorism, only they're threatening someone else will hurt them if they don't do as they say.
justtom4now (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Ok, so it is your view that a person cannot consider someone guilty of a crime unless they have been convicted of that crime?
justtom4now (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
How is anyone, especially a dead person, deprived of life, liberty, or property, because a private citizen states he is guilty of a crime? The Constitution forbids governmental sanction absent a trial and guilty verdict, it does not forbid a private citizen of making a statement.
ABSCreations (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
hahahahaha
armistices (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Vote for me or get blown the fuck up!
bobbio122 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I am quite intrigued by Goldwater's policy on education. Nuking of mathematically inept children would surely raise average test scores.
Faithfightsfoes (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
this scared me the first time i saw it :Bit's pretty cool, though. |
