|
somor98 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Margaret Mead got it way wrong.
hamocydal1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
my bad i fudged the quote..itz actually.."As you know, Samoan girls are terrific liars.."LMAOOOOOOOOO!
hamocydal1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
u want to know the best line out of this whole series?"you know samoan girls are good liars.."hahahaha!tala mo'i a!choooo hooo!
leonerhian (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
i hate dramatic reconstructions. this is stupid; in the sepia toned clips, they're at Papase'ea sliding rocks in Upolu. it irritates me because the whole story is on AmSam. secondly, im ambivalent towards Freeman but im so not feeling the bias BBC is engaged in through this whole programme: they're making him look unneccessarily loony and crazy
AkeNia029001 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Science?What crap!the point of da matter is dis-u palagis (Foreigners) cum 2 Samoa using yr own sordid & limited knowledge 2 try and teach us & da World what OUR CULTURE is suppose 2 b?-UNBELIEVABLE!MM went wif da mentality of a racist,sh ws lonely, tryin' 2 discover her own sexuality & using our people as a front 2 hide her own sordid fantasties.Derek Freeman ws correctin hr wrong, but ws ignored by pple dat don't knw an ounce of da Samoan Culture,life or people like Derek did.
mightisright (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yes, liberals like Mead are the worst racists of all. They insult all humanity with their lies.
humanist7117 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
This video errs in using the general term Anthropology when they are referring to Cultural Anthropology. This is not about physical anthropolgy>
lemafai (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Wow, that is my great grandmother that they interviewed at the beginning of this clip. May she rest in peace.
popinjay3000 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
it was the other chap who mentioned objectivity speaking up for freeman- its difficult to even watch a you tube video with objectivity =no subjective lens no anthropology...and how unethical were those aaa handjobs!
ayalausc (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
It was very arrogant of Freeman to say (allegedly) that he was "objective." No one is objective in science. One can have a perfect sample size, with a perfect methodology to analyze data, and the observer can still be biased in his/her analysis for whatever reason. Just look at the fiascos in clinical trials where there are methods other than observational field work. |
