soarer205 (September 21, 2008 at 4:58 pm)

yes cause u know better that these peoplle dont u

ssnatcherss (August 4, 2008 at 4:38 am)

there's no reason to build anything that expensive without gaining some kind of insight into how it will perform. many problems can be caught and resolved before throwing money at a model. of course similations are only approximations (hence the scale model tests), but they're still really important (and cost effective) in the design process of high performance systems like an F1.

scotty3032 (July 24, 2008 at 7:05 am)

These guys are amazing, they are at the top of their game and at the forefront of technology, keep up the good work guys

TrackratM3 (July 5, 2008 at 5:03 am)

I left a video response,I need to barrow your facility,ill bring the dounuts ,thanksany input about my video would be appreciated, you guys are underrated in this sport..

p3tr0lh3ad (June 14, 2008 at 12:36 pm)

science is boring id rather have a 1960s alfa which is unaerodymanic than a 2020s f1 car because theres no passion any more

vadimo (June 1, 2008 at 11:35 am)

thanks for posting this,very interesting

masteropie001 (May 25, 2008 at 12:11 am)

Computer simulations suck. Enjoy the false information it gives.

jerry130885 (April 20, 2008 at 5:38 pm)

Where can i get an F1 that size for my son?? lol..

spartan1893 (April 9, 2008 at 5:28 am)

lol surprisingly they r!!!

jordanf1king (February 21, 2008 at 5:34 pm)

my rules would be you can only have wheels steering wheel brakes and a body.I like the 1995 to 1999 f1 cars