trivisuals (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

well, lets see.....Mrs. Robinson lived in a Beverly Hills mansion not a tract house. Come on............

Gohanto (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Decent, some bad cinematography and uneven sound, but that's not the focus. Acting wise the intentions are there, but the delivery is too much "playing" the line instead of living it. The guy comes across trying to be awkward basically, which I would fix by having him draw on his on past experiences or imaged one (what if his gf's mom started hitting on him).Camera angles were annoying, all simple and chosen from convenience over serving the story.

AlanaWray (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

i think the acting's pretty good

illertop10 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

and thats my fault

nachtmerries (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

dont quit your day job

LOLOL134324 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

i don t like it the sound isnt good and the acting isn t great either

LaMostraESopra (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Sorry, I really was being incredibly rude.And I didn't have a problem with your work, in fact, I thought it was quite nice. I guess I am just partial to Anne Bancroft's performance.You make a good point though; I suppose there aren't that many ways to portray a seduction scene, especially this one. I dunno, being an actor myself, I guess I was just looking for a take on the characters that was not as similar to Bancroft's and Hoffman's.

alexander10552 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

...minus the part where he unzips her dress, of course.and also, how much of a divergence do you think is possible in a scene of seduction? maybe i'm biased as a male, but to me there seems only so few ways to portray the sexual entrancement of a guy who is 20 years younger than the woman. and i'm also just babbling now...

alexander10552 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

yes, i have seen the movie.i appreciate (sort of) that you took the time to critique this short. but in all actuality, you're not so much critiquing as you are criticizing. tell me what i could have done better! not what i did wrong or what the actors did wrong. and your comment on having no originality? i disagree. the actress played the role at a much slower pace than Bancroft did, and a lot less body language and more seduction through the use of her words.

LaMostraESopra (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Jesus Christ.Have YOU seen the movie??I find it very hard to believe that she hadn't seen the movie when her performance is nearly exactly the same as Bancroft's.A good impersonation, yes, I must say that it is.But original? Not at all.