Search:

F1 Racing Formula One Racing F1 Car Racing Grand Prix Racing F1 Kart Racing McLaren Racing Team Williams F1 Team Ferrari F1 Racing Renault F1 Team F1 Racing Cars Racing School F1 Racing Game BMW F1 Racing Indy Car Racing

Objective Vs Subjective Morals

Formula 1 Racing
Formula 1 Racing Formula 1 Racing
Formula 1 Racing

In response to Veritas http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

Channel: People & Blogs
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm
Author: g0at

Length: 07:26
Rating: 4.59
Views: 3231

Tags: argument  atheism  creation  evolution  existence  God  morality  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

rathwej (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
This video is ridiculously obvious. Im shocked that someone is actually trying to refute this LOGIC.
missionarysarahbarry (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
when people believe in bible's god, even killing children becomes moral: Moses was angry with the officers of the army who returned from battle. "Have you allowed all the women to live? They were the ones who followed Balaam's advice and turned the Israelites away from the LORD in what happened at Peor, so that a plague struck the LORD's people. Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man. [Num 31:14-18]
perfectfromafar (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
A woman with a highly genetic disorder has has unintentionally pregnant. She can let that child be born, to a horrible life because of this disorder. Or can she have an abortion and save an innocent person from going through a difficult and unfair life.Some would argue that these two scenarios are murder, some would disagree, so no, not everyone agrees that taking a life is always wrong.
perfectfromafar (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
A terminally ill patient is being subjected to a long and painful death, the patient would rather go away peacefully, should the doctor help them in what is called "assisted suicide", or should the doctor let the patient go through all this pain and suffering, for the same outcome:death.
D0minus (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
(part 2) So, no bad vibes in neither one of two ways of thinking means that:a)both are right --> defeding objective morality ORb)right, wrong, good, evil, and morality are concepts created by men. --> defending subjective moralityIF there is only ONE truth*, a) becomes impossible.*Truth is only one more concept created by men, and by its own definition, there's only one.
D0minus (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
(Part 1) Here is a simple way to prove g0at argument is logical:g0at has his opinion because he thinks that's the way to think. The other guys have their opinion, because they think that's the way to think. Both sides defend that they think THE RIGHT way, and none of them feel "bad vibes" for not thinking otherwise.
monataxe (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Yin and YanGood and EvilDay and NightReality and DreamLove and HateEverything and NothingPositief and NegatiefBalance and ChaosObjectif and Subjectif = another creation of men to simply be able to define so aspects later on it might not even have a meaning. Now to be able to start somewhere you set rules to be able to determine your world but those rules stays anyhow a creation, so actually objectivity in alsides stays subjectif opinion because these rules where created by men.
ladyboyloadsdotcom (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
To be 100% truthful if I believed in god fully and saw a homeless man in the gutter I would not bother to help him. I would think to myself god has a purpose for him being there and if he wants him saved he will.As an atheist I want to help all those in need because I KNOW there is no god to save them. So the reality for me is as a believer I would behave far worse then as an atheist
SparkamusPryme (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
In cognitive science, we call things like the experience of color response dependent properties that are 'intersubjective'. If you zoomed down to the level of atoms and photons, there would be no color (photons and wavelengths are measurements, not phenomenological experience). It's only in the mind that color exists. Yet, we have a more-or-less ubiquitous experience of color--seemingly objective. (Einstein's theory of relativity opens up question about whether *time* is intersubjective)
kaoson2K8 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Briefly in simplified term, synonymously, like Math, if people had 12 fingers they will count from 1 to 12 - just like we would count from 1 to 10 with our fingers. In scientific notation, it will be (A) X 12^ (B). So in Math, we are subjective with the way we prefer to write our equations - we use 10 instead of 12 counts. So, when there are subjective ways of expressing things, there are also objective to solve equations -get the solution. So, maybe subjective and objective goes hand and hand?

Formula 1 Racing © 2007 All Rights Reserved.