b0rncha0s (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

yeah I don't see why we don't give hydrogen internal combustion engines a chance. Apparently it's relatively simple to convert/build regular gasoline IC motors to run on hydrogen and hydrogen production is slightly more environmentally friendly than gasoline production. I don't like electric fuel cell :( can you imagine a silent m5? wtf

EuroSport2006 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Exactly. When I hear of hydrogen cars, its the BMW 7-Series that comes to mind. Not that General Motors bullshit or Honda Fuel Cell crap. BMW

b0rncha0s (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

BMW is the only company I know of that has a "production ready" internal combustion Hydrogen vehicle. Everyone else is experimenting with Fuel Cell, which powers essentially electric vehicles. I'd rather have Hydrogen internal combustion

merlindos (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Inaugurada la planta piloto de Hydrosol-IIjueves, 10 de abril de 2008

garethegreat (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

This car is priseless as its a prototype. However honda made 1 I think and thats a hydrogen and its 5million pounds

richietiptop (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

yeap i 100% agree with u.

EuroSport2006 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

It's funny. BMW started the Hydrogen vehicles and now everyone is starting it, trying to claim they started it. Sorry, the true production hydrogen car was the BMW 7H.

PureLogix (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

We should be using solar and wind energy to convert salt water into hydrogen. That way there is no carbon footprint.

Regimond (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

who is working on this?

p9893 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

burning hydrogen in an internal combustion engine does not cause any carbon dioxide, just a bit of NOx, but less than 50% of the emissions of petrol driven engines. The problem is to get the hydrogen, here much CO2 is produced, but this is a common problem to the Hydrogen combustion engine and the hydrogen fuel cell.