|
Culiel (September 4, 2008 at 4:35 pm)
Clear, concise. Keep fighting for us, Lessig.
stisaac (July 24, 2008 at 10:11 pm)
I like google book search and believe it is fair use. However, the thumbnail example is not exactly the same as what google does. Though end-users see a 'thumbnail' or 'transformation' of the book, google has copied the entire work to its personal servers. In the case of the thumbnails, only the transformation was stored on the engine's servers.
SinOfYesterd (July 14, 2008 at 8:29 pm)
WHO GIVES A SHIT!
barbiegirl62995 (July 7, 2008 at 3:34 pm)
no pickle
wilsonnkwan (April 26, 2008 at 7:51 pm)
I really wonder how itunes and Imeem managed to preview copyrighted work for 30secs for each song (which is much more than 10% of original content) got away and Google is being sued. Copyright laws nowadays are so strict that things are not getting into public domain.
noodleswat (December 9, 2007 at 3:41 pm)
some obviously absorb little of this, based on comments. It's truly excellent. Thank you for your efforts to bring it to the web. Your presention is one that many companies should consider hiring. Quite pleasant in it's presentation.
muzicman01 (September 25, 2007 at 8:14 pm)
my question is how the hell did you get your video so long
Multisynth (September 7, 2007 at 9:20 pm)
A very clear video and thought on the subject. Thanks.
grumpysquidward (August 16, 2007 at 11:04 pm)
that rocked>>>>>>>>>>>>>>please check out my videos
grumpysquidward (August 16, 2007 at 11:03 pm)
very interreting |
