Search:

F1 Racing Formula One Racing F1 Car Racing Grand Prix Racing F1 Kart Racing McLaren Racing Team Williams F1 Team Ferrari F1 Racing Renault F1 Team F1 Racing Cars Racing School F1 Racing Game BMW F1 Racing Indy Car Racing

Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing

Formula 1 Racing
Formula 1 Racing Formula 1 Racing
Formula 1 Racing

This video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth is growing. This collides with the Pangea theory. Watch it, you will be amazed.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: February 23, 2007 at 6:29 pm
Author: ravious260

Length: 10:01
Rating: 3.77
Views: 1119707

Tags: ADULT  ARE  BUSH  BUT  CONSPIRACY  EARTH  HERE  HISTORY  IMPORTANT  IN  IS  KNOW  NOT  SCIENCE  SPACE  THESE  THIS  VERY  WAR  WORD  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

ctkgod (July 24, 2008 at 6:39 am)
what abunch of bullshit.... a round earth? yeah lets pretend it's not flat.
distressed7 (July 24, 2008 at 6:11 am)
The underground held water in great amounts as it does today. The "fountains of the great deep."
yohonifer (July 24, 2008 at 5:58 am)
i'm sorry but this is complete and utter horse! just because you can make it fit and look good in graphics, does not make it real. where did all the mass come from? what about the water? how about mountains?
magpiesmn (July 24, 2008 at 5:41 am)
Well I'm no expert but I would say that if the earth was cooling it could very easly be expanding. I could also see the earth expanding if somehow it was gaining energy from some onknown/known effect. This is a hugely interesting video and I have not heard anything about this before. I just kinda assumed that the scientists had the earths creation down to a science guess they got me on this one...
RetSquid (July 24, 2008 at 5:40 am)
So subduction zone volcanos don't exist? the mountains were always there?
SolMaster (July 24, 2008 at 5:32 am)
Seems like today's a slow night for this comment page... Oh well, I'll post those questions next time Neal is around. Hopefully, for the sake of his theory, he'll be able to give some answers and let the actual discussion continue (bickering aside).
MagikosEksMaikhina (July 24, 2008 at 4:55 am)
... enough matter there to alow for the earth to grow to the extent you propose. Remember, your the one who was ousted from the scientific comunity because you conduceted yourself like a crackpot. No, its not a freeking conspiracy, you're just to foolish to let go of a demonstrbly wrong idea.Maybe, if you were wiser, you would watch who you're calling an dunce.This will be almost certainly be my last comment here, as you are compleatly beyond help.
MagikosEksMaikhina (July 24, 2008 at 4:49 am)
Wow, stedy there neal, at least try to make some sense.If I called plasma a gas, I used inoised in the same sentence, and was discribing it to you because you seemed to think that plasma could magicaly create thousands of tones of matter. You never mentioned positrons, and I don't see where the hell your geting them from. Unfortuantely for you, even poofing antimater into existance inside the earth's mantal isn't enoughf to save your 'consept' (not worthy of title:theory) there isn't...
SolMaster (July 24, 2008 at 4:47 am)
Shh, Yorgias. I'm trying to stop the ridiculing for a while to see just how much information Neal can cite about his theory. I mean, if he can provide some more specific information and it proves true, Neal's hypothesis is that much better. It's the scientific process; if a theory is representative of the real world, scrutiny should only serve to make it stronger. Less ad hominem, more talk about what's really going on.I think we should get away from the bickering and look more at the data.
yorgias (July 24, 2008 at 4:24 am)
Well, pretty obvious why none of neal's ideas have been accepted. (other than the fact they've been directly refuted by experiment)Neal's never studied science. Simple as that. Combine that with Dunning kruger, as diamonddave pointed out, and you get neal, who spends hours per day swearing at people for presenting the actual reality to him on a silver platter. Such behavior would have him thrown out of any science organization or university.

Formula 1 Racing © 2007 All Rights Reserved.