honkifurh0rny (October 9, 2008 at 4:32 am)

i tell you what has better physics then this? REAL LIFE you should try it

kallampunk (September 30, 2008 at 7:00 pm)

You must think that this industry only has 20 years old. Whit this you must think how whould the people been with cinema on his first 20 years, it was very stupid, no?

masterpiraka (August 28, 2008 at 9:19 pm)

LOL.You fail at the easy-as-hell-not-skill of point seeing.

CommieComrade179 (August 17, 2008 at 9:54 pm)

It's not a demonstration of visual graphics, this is just a demo of havoc physics. It's not a real game, just something made for this purpose.

Caleb1916 (August 13, 2008 at 1:57 am)

They aren't showing off this character, you're just pulling at straws.

CriticalBanana (August 10, 2008 at 6:22 pm)

It's all very impressive I'm sure, but the character running through all this amazing advancement in graphics still looks about as believable as a late 90's arcade machine.My point is that video games and their writers simply have not yet mastered absolute realism in the graphical representation of the on screen main players. Who will care, or more to the point - who will even notice, the environment conforming to real physics when their character still has as much believability as robocop?

Stonedwo0kie (July 23, 2008 at 8:14 pm)

I do :)I want a steaming bowl of your Man Soup!

Ratilis (July 4, 2008 at 1:09 pm)

dluppers1 MAJOR FAIL NOOB!!!

kernowed (July 2, 2008 at 10:59 pm)

Omfgg your not serious are you? no i must have read your post in a dream.

LeoDJ1992 (June 29, 2008 at 2:44 am)

Noooo poor guy you are burning his balls!!!