|
FoShizzle713 (October 5, 2008 at 2:42 am)
this is impractical and slow, but it's a really cool idea
liszt85 (October 1, 2008 at 5:01 pm)
This was given by Tony Jacob at the discussion forums in our college where somebody posted a link to this video. The answer is pretty simple really.
Rika7792 (September 29, 2008 at 3:36 pm)
wow...that's so cool~
italonorse (September 23, 2008 at 12:33 am)
I think there's an easier way of doing this.
okidot (September 22, 2008 at 10:10 pm)
very cool, not very practical, but is very fascinating to see the structure of maths within geomotries, and how all numbers correspond
thebryanexperience (September 22, 2008 at 8:31 pm)
lol didnt see your comment
thebryanexperience (September 22, 2008 at 8:30 pm)
well, its kind of cool.... but let me see you do 897x998 that would be way to much to deal with.. so therefor I will go ahead and use a calculator, cause as far as I know they work just fine...
Organasm (September 21, 2008 at 2:44 pm)
It's not useful at all since a) the method isn't actually being explained at all andb) it's still faster doing it the regular way, i.e. (321x100) + (321x20) + (321x3)
dasergiooo (September 13, 2008 at 7:42 pm)
do you have a proof of this? or is this just random?
sunesissociety (September 9, 2008 at 2:50 pm)
Google "Sunesis Society" High I.Q. society for Christians! Top 99.3rd percentile of the population-Smarter than Mensa! Come Join the Cause! Intelligence for Jesus! |
