yardman8888 (September 11, 2008 at 2:32 am)

no man. i disagree. My turbo rsx would whoop ur behind. I blew my motor and got the supercharger and i like it A LOT

hmglorboi1 (August 6, 2008 at 7:44 am)

no matter how fast or how nice looking the rsx look...i rather go with the evo...cuz evo is what i got...and if you waste that grand on that rsx..you could of built that evo..and bousting like a higher psi on it...

rmnovak86 (June 9, 2008 at 12:58 am)

lmfao... 235... 3.8" pulley? I get 304WHP no aftercooler 11psi 3" pulley... get serious. I jsut wasted 6 minutes of my life watching you morons do nothing

rmnovak86 (June 9, 2008 at 12:55 am)

lol.... the wheels spun the dyno correct?

yang259 (March 3, 2008 at 1:39 am)

is the hp, wheel hp???

vinnieboi17 (February 21, 2008 at 10:25 am)

hey you guys live in clovis ca huh? nice rsx i bet it can take on a evo nice job with tuning!

stwatson (February 13, 2008 at 8:04 pm)

some of the people commenting on this video dont need to be. Stock RSX = 175whp (200hp at the flywheel). Supercharge can add much more power. I just dyno'd my and it put down 285whp. Im sure this car is running low boost cause the Jackson Racing charger is capable of much more than this. I got over 110whp added from my blower...and it cost $2400. Some of you guys need to know what your talkin about before you post here:)

MARKMARKDUDE (January 31, 2008 at 1:38 am)

stock 200 AT THE FLY..theres a difference.

bunz559 (January 2, 2008 at 5:28 am)

i'd like to see this... hahaha!! stock 200hp? i have to see dyno sheets before i could possibly believe this.

MaddDogg69 (December 22, 2007 at 9:28 am)

only 235? I get 253whp in my turbo RSX-S on only like 6.5psi