sustayne (June 24, 2008 at 6:02 pm)

I can understand putting together a controvertial film to get attention for one's self or a worthy cause, but to promote a blatant lie...I just don't see the point. Nobody wins. The believers look gullible, the film-maker looks foolish, if not hostile, the non-believers feel badly for the slandered and will be very hesitant to ever give the film-maker a second chance. It's even bad for the First Amendment right. If I believed in censorship, this film would be squarely in my cross-hairs.

moonmovies (April 24, 2008 at 7:05 pm)

TYPO: "know that NASA can AND DOES (do) alter photos"

moonmovies (April 24, 2008 at 7:03 pm)

No problem my friend. We just want people to know that NASA can do alter photos - and we have proven that they HAVE altered photos. No one even questions that now. From Oberg to Windley, none of the propagandists try to argue this point. They all KNOW that NASA altered the photos.

moontrue (April 24, 2008 at 9:09 am)

sorry hehe i missed the text from the beginning Inside joke

moontrue (April 24, 2008 at 9:05 am)

sorry this is 2 pictures put together

un4g1v3n1 (April 24, 2008 at 6:39 am)

Anyone who thinks the LEM pictured there was worthy of flying, let alone sustaining a survivable atmosphere, surely cannot be of sound mind...