|
kissermale (August 1, 2008 at 8:02 pm)
I work with advertising, and one thing that we're always running against is TIME. I doubt any client would give the agency the luxury to plan and make the commercial in one (or two) take. So, if that's not all CG, it HAS to be lots of (not 2 or 3) shots stitched together.
Himom2032 (August 1, 2008 at 5:55 pm)
It was like 2 or 3 shots.
kissermale (June 26, 2008 at 8:24 pm)
Hmmmm... no CGI? All in one shot? Come on people... at MINIMUM the shot several pieces and then added them all together on the computer, erasing the edges digitally.
Tuneman1984 (February 19, 2008 at 1:07 pm)
Just imagine the energy in that room once they got it right
tukkajumala (November 29, 2007 at 7:55 pm)
How on earth does anyone have that much patience?! I would have given up a long time ago. It is great that someone in this world still cares to make real art :)
exphine (September 23, 2007 at 6:51 pm)
I swear the god I coudn't believe that it was real-time shooting till I saw this.All you can do is admiration.
mikemclaren (June 19, 2007 at 3:00 am)
because cg looks fake
AndyCheng (May 31, 2007 at 12:45 pm)
Yeah, cus the graphics would give it away if in used in the time.
limeyosu (May 23, 2007 at 6:50 pm)
That was such a good commercial! i bet it was frustrating as hell getting everything to work just right!
Goorl (May 19, 2007 at 8:35 pm)
Cuz if they would have done it in the computers, it would be fake - thus allowing thousand of Youtube users flaming them for doing it fake. |
