kurizzos (September 22, 2008 at 4:55 am)

An observation for anyone viewing vid:The last comment before the credits may be network load balancing. When one of the physical servers are offline, then clustering will handle the loss...

anbu19983 (September 3, 2008 at 9:07 am)

It's really awesome.

robustair (August 31, 2008 at 12:17 am)

I am not satisfied with your virtualization video, Its really losting.

eorlas1 (July 31, 2008 at 6:44 am)

You can load one server with strong and powerful hardware and then run something like VMWare to make a virtual server that essentially runs a lot of virtual machines that each will draw from a designated amount of resources based on what that virtual machine will be used for.If it's strictly just word processing and browsing the internet, that virtual machine will probably receive 1gb of ram max and maybe a ghz of ram but that's probably pushing it for such a non-demanding workload.

killerdog92 (May 31, 2008 at 4:33 pm)

omg, noob, u don't need as many physical servers as before.

foreverseethe (May 30, 2008 at 2:00 pm)

totally lost me. IN PLAIN ENGLISH motherfucka!. If Virtualization requires just as much maintenance and increases complexty wtf is the point?!?! I swear, fucking nerds, man.

koonhay (March 21, 2008 at 9:06 pm)

what about the harware compatibility issues?

paulcshearer (January 5, 2008 at 10:50 pm)

great clip!

eaglefly23 (October 12, 2007 at 11:04 am)

great info. clip! gives me reason to hang on to my vmw shares.

LordRhimmer (August 22, 2007 at 9:26 am)

Wow thanks for the info.