crucified2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Watch these videos by Dr David Berlinski. He proves that evolution is an absolute laughing stock of idiotic claims. watch?v=Ec8lpcA5hls&feature=related

crucified2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

In an 8 part debate right here on youtube! Here is the video part 1:watch?v=gT3NZTGCtrI

1emart1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"Not according to Ken Miller!"Where does Ken Miller claim otherwise?

1emart1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"No! Not in the remotest sense! NONSENSE! Without any sense!"What does not make sense about evolution through natural selection?

crucified2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"It was an ancestral mammal which does not exist today"Not according to Ken Miller!

crucified2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"does evolution through the process of natural selection make sense?"No! Not in the remotest sense! NONSENSE! Without any sense!

1emart1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Furthermore, we have currently been discussing evolution as a whole. In other words, does evolution through the process of natural selection make sense? Now, it being rational does not automatically make it true. But it is an important first step.When it comes to whales specifically, I am not terribly familiar with their evolutionary history. But I can direct you towards resources that can provide such information, if you are interested.

1emart1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"So how many transitional fossils have been found that link the hippo and the Blue Whale?"I have been permitting you to continue to make an error in terminology in favor of helping you to understand the more important concept, but now I must correct your usage of the term 'hippo'. No one has proposed that modern hippos existed millions of years ago as they are today, and it was this population that went on to become whales. It was an ancestral mammal which does not exist today.

crucified2 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

So how many transitional fossils have been found that link the hippo and the Blue Whale? Have they done a DNA test on both? Is the genome similar? What evidence do you have to support your claim?

1emart1 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

"SMALL adaptive changes?"Yes."You call a Blue Whale a SMALL adaptive change to the hippo?"No. I would consider that a big change, but the terms are subjective and dont really matter. I recognize that small changes can accumulate, resulting in big changes. Just like a dollar a day can add up to a lot of money over years, small changes over many generations can add up to big changes.